Criminal Law, Deportation, Immigration To The USA

Delivering Solutions For Your Future
Immigration in America, USA flag

IMMIGRANTS NUMBERING THOUSANDS CAN BE DETAINED INDEFINITELY ACCORDING TO THE SUPREME COURT’S RULINGS

June 22, 2022

IMMIGRANTS NUMBERING THOUSANDS CAN BE DETAINED INDEFINITELY ACCORDING TO THE SUPREME COURT’S RULINGS

Author: New York Immigration Lawyer Alena Shautsova

As the issue of immigration in the U.S. seems to be a never-ending rigmarole subject, new developments are expected at every turn. Most recently, the Supreme Court ruled that immigrants detained in the United States are not entitled to a bond hearing in certain situations. This ruling means that the thousands of immigrants currently held in detention facilities with open immigration cases can remain in detention indefinitely! It does not apply to all immigrants, but rather to those who already have orders of removal, but cannot depart or have additional hearings that must be conducted.

In addition to the Supreme Court’s ruling, the high court also ruled that federal courts do not possess the legal authority to grant class-wide relief to immigrants held in detention. This means that, if detainees want to petition their right to a bond hearing in the future, they can only present their cases individually. This is coupled with the fact that immigrants are not allowed to have legal representation during immigration proceedings.

The ruling of the Supreme Court seems to maintain the existing state of affairs as it concerns the issue of immigration. Many immigrants are currently detained in facilities that are more like prisons. Many immigrants have not been charged with any crime but do not possess the right to a hearing to justify their detention. Some of the immigrants are held in facilities belonging to for-profit corporations such as Geo Group and a host of others. The Court ruling also maintains that immigrants can’t have a bond hearing unless the U.S. government says so. This means that the U.S. government has the discretionary right to decide the fate of detainees. In other words, it will be up to DHS/ICE if the person is released from the detention or not, and if ICE/DHS does not want to release the person, they can keep them there technically, forever.

These  rulings dashes the hopes of immigrants who have been held long enough in detention. The cases which are Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez and Garland v. Aleman Gonzalez were brought to court by undocumented immigrants who contested they are being held in detention centers for far too long. Their argument was focused on the fact that immigrants who have been held in detention for up to six months or more should be entitled to an individualized bond hearing where the U.S. government has to prove the need for their continued detention.

The immigrants sued the U.S. government while leveraging on a 1996 immigration statute which states that an unauthorized immigrant “may” remain in detention for an extended period if they fail to meet certain criteria. The immigrants argued that since the statute uses “may be detained” instead of “shall be detained,” the right of discretion rests with the judges, hence entitling them to a hearing. The case was further appealed to the Supreme Court where representatives of the Biden administration argued that the law permits the Attorney General of the United States to indefinitely detain illegal immigrants while their cases are undergoing litigation.

Before the Supreme Court’s ruling, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in 2020 that detainees are entitled to a bond hearing. Since the Garland case was presented as a class-action lawsuit, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a class-wide relief, thereby extending the right to a bond hearing to every person named in the suit.

However, the Supreme Court countered this ruling declaring that detainees are not entitled to such a bond hearing, hence a class-wide relief can’t be granted on that basis. Therefore anybody who wishes to exercise their right to a bond hearing in whatever form has to do it individually.

Certain observers feel that it is a bit unfair not to grant unauthorized immigrants the right to legal representation, whereas criminals in the U.S. are allowed legal representation. “Especially since their only offense is that they are in search of greener pastures,” according to an observer. Leah Litman, a professor at the University of Michigan Law School filed a brief in support of Gonzalez. She holds the opinion that the decision of the Supreme Court is completely unworkable and unrealistic. Furthermore, she asserted, “It makes it impossible to ensure that everyone who is potentially entitled to a bond hearing will get one.”

Aside from being denied a desired fair hearing, immigrants and advocates have since raised an alarm concerning the manner of treatment meted out to immigrants at the detention centers. Several facilities have been accused of abusing detainees. The Irwin County Detention Centre was shut down alongside another in May 2021. A gynecologist was accused of carrying out forced sterilization on the detained women at the Irwin Center.

Matt Adams, the legal director of the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project who argued the Garland case opines that the decision of the Court raises ethical questions. This is a result of the fact that the ruling contradicts the fundamental principles upon which the U.S system is founded- “that government officials may not lock up a person without at least providing them their day in court to contest whether their confinement is justified.” Although he gives reassurance that the matter will still be pursued as it is not over yet.

Border security, backlogged courts and the political divide over immigration

May 27, 2022

Border security, backlogged courts and the political divide over immigration

Author: New York Immigration Lawyer Alena Shautsova

Since the end of the fiscal year 2021, the number of people who stopped trying to cross the southwest  of the United States border has not gone down. People fleeing the consequences of the failed governments in their home countries, climate change and aggressive and uncontrollable gangs. The Trump administration tried to stop the migration by proposing to build a physical barrier and involving Title 42- legal barrier to immigration. The Biden administration rejected the idea of a physical barrier, but continued with the legal barrier, trying to find solutions that would be acceptable for both democrats and republicans. It happened that the “border security” argument became the main point of discussion when both sides are trying to address the much needed immigration reform in the United States.

Undocumented non-citizens

Thousands of undocumented immigrants live in the U.S. Many entered the United States without inspection through the “border”, many overstayed their visas but initially entered “legally”. Some were ordered deported or removed on paper but have never been physically removed from the United States. The issue becomes not only an administrative law issue, but an issue of Human Rights: because of the years- long delays in the processing of the migrants’ cases, undocumented non-citizens often develop deep social and economic ties with the United States, and their physical removal can occur decades after their initial entry becomes more akin to criminal punishment in its consequences rather than administrative citation. When addressing the “security” at the border, one can successfully argue that a physical barrier, can slow down the migration to some extent, but will not and cannot resolve the problem. The problem of global migration can be resolved only through an effective processing system of the non-citizens, and creation of favorable conditions in their home countries, where the need to move and uproot your family would not exist in the first place.

These are hard goals to accomplish, as they require talent, resources, effective management, and dedication. One would have to carefully balance the due process rights of non-citizens, human rights laws, and government interests in establishing procedures that would be effective and fair.  We can all remember draconian measures of Trump administration where children, sometimes, only months-old young, were separated at the border from their parents, many of those children were never united with their parents ever again. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/21/us/migrant-children-separated.html. At the same time,  Biden’s administration’s policy to allow non-citizens to entered the United States and then wait for months for their Notices to appear in court, also is not a good solution: the persons were placed in a limbo status where the document that has to initiate the court proceedings against them in a court would not be filed with the court for months and months, preventing persons to present their cases and obtain relief for those who qualify.  It seems such a policy was installed to allow the courts to artificially reduce the amount of pending cases, reporting a smaller backlog…  But it is obvious that without hiring more Immigration judges, border security personnel, and asylum officers, the backlog will not and cannot be eliminated. Cases of non-citizens require human review, they cannot be rubber-stamped by a computer, and human review requires humans, it means MORE personnel. The questions become ones of resources rather than morals.

Why There is No Immigration Reform?

Many can remember promises Biden made during the elections… the US Citizenship Act of 2021 sounded too good to be true… and of course, it never, to date materialized. But why? The obvious answer would be that the parties cannot agree on the terms of the proposals. But if you read the proposals from both sides, at times, they are not so different. So, what is really in the way of passing Immigration reform? Some say it is an issue of border security… However, it is obvious that the “border security” is only one side of the many-sided shape of the Immigrant land shaft we are dealing with. What about people who have been in the United States for decades and paid taxes, and do not have any criminal convictions. Still, even for those people, who are essential workers, TPS holders, seasonal farmers or DACA holders still, there is no relief…. At the time, the Congress can approve in a matter of hours spending bills and surpass any relief necessary to let’s say small businesses in the United States. The logical answer to this question is that neither side wants to pass a bill that would solve an immigration issue in the United States. Perhaps, some believe that administrative violators should not be awarded, some cite economic consequences and labor market collapse in case migrants who are already in the United States, are employed and will receive an official authorization to work and pay taxes… (does not make any sense, but the argument still pops up). Perhaps, the true reason would be that the situation is comfortable for those who have never felt the burden of being a reject, a “half” citizen, who works for people with voting rights and serves them well, but those with the power to change their fellow-non-documented residents fate are reluctant to do so in fear of losing some advantages…

So if this is the true answer, do you believe that a true, comprehensive reform is ever possible? What has to change for it to happen? The author believes that it is possible, but only when the need for it will outweigh the benefits of non-action. Without advocacy, true dedication to reform the society, implement innovations, and spend money on internal issues, the Immigration reform will not happen. Underfunded courts cannot be effective. USCIS, Asylum and border security personnel need salaries and training. Perhaps, the root of the issues lies in the constant ignoring of needs in the administrative sector on a Federal and local level.  

USCIS Processing Times, Immigration Court Updates and More!

January 18, 2022

NYC Immigration Lawyer Alena Shautsova shares the most recent updates regarding USCIS real processing times for I 765, I 485, N 400 and I 601A; discusses the most recent Immigration news and practices.

US Immigration News Updates

August 4, 2021

Alena Shautsova, New York Immigration lawyer shares the most recent Immigration news.

Recent Immigration news: DACA’s new applications hold, COVID entry restrictions, essential workers reform plans and progress, and more.

Biden Administration Reveals Immigration Blueprint

July 29, 2021

Biden Administration Reveals Immigration Blueprint

Author: NYC Immigration Lawyer Alena Shautsova

On July 27, 2021 Biden Administration published Immigration Blueprint or a comprehensive plan that includes steps to reform the United States Immigration System. The plan addresses the most troublesome areas of the US Immigration including border security and asylum, Immigration court and access to representation in immigration proceedings, visa backlog, and more. The published Blueprint can be accessed at www.whitehouse.gov.

In this video I share my thoughts on the Blueprint, and provide more explanations on the issue:

Subscribe to our YouTube Channel: 🔔 Click here and subscribe to my channel for the Latest Immigration News https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBSrIQswMdYh_T1qToEZRrQ?sub_confirmation=1

👩🏻‍🎓Follow me on social media: 👍Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/nyimmigrationlawyer/ 👍Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/immigrationlawyerny/ 👍Twitter: https://twitter.com/ShautsovaLawNY 👍LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/alena-shautsova-3123577/ 👍TikTok @realimmigrationlawyerny

Immigration News: DACA Is Ordered Illegal By a Federal Judge

July 23, 2021

Author: NYC Immigration Lawyer Alena Shautsova

DACA or Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals has helped hundreds of thousands of kids who were brought to the United States to be protected from deportation and receive at least a work permit. It was first announced by President Obama in 2012, and ever since has been a target of political wars between pro and against immigrant forces. DACA was able to withstand various attacks until recently when a Texas federal judge ordered the program to be illegal. Judge Hanen stated that President Obama did exceed his authority to protect kids from deportation, and ordered that the Department of Homeland Security stops approving new DACA applications… Judge Hanen’s decision left many in frustration and dismay: thousands of kids and now young adults lost all hopes for “legalization.” With their future in the US uncertain, all hopes turned to the Senate. The vote in the Senate may help to pass American Dream and Promise Act which provided status to those who are DACA eligible and other young adults… See our proposed reform summaries here: https://www.russianspeakinglawyerny.com/immigration-reform-updates-when-will-it-happen/.

For now, all those who are currently holding DACA status remain eligible for renewals, including employment authorizations and advance paroles, but no new applications can be approved. However, those filing for the first time may file their applications with USCIS, but the applications will not be approved until Judge Hanon’s decision is changed or appealed.

Watch our video and explanation on the most recent DACA news:

Breaking Immigration News: Administrative Closure Is Back!

July 16, 2021

Author: New York Immigration Lawyer Alena Shautsova

Today, July 15, 2021, the Biden Administration overturned Trump’s Attorney General’s decision in Matter of Castro‑Tum, 27 I&N Dec. 271 (A.G. 2018) and returned administrative closure to the US Immigration courts.

The significance of the decision cannot be overstated: for years since Castro-Tum, immigration Judges were deprived of the ability to control their dockets and postpone cases where respondents were waiting for interim reliefs.

Administrative closure will allow resolving the US Immigration court backlog, and will be helpful to those who either cannot have relief from removal, or have to wait for USCIS to adjudicate underlying petitions.

Watch more:

BREAKING NEWS

Immigration News: USCIS Waives Interviews, Biden Holds Naturalization Event, Immigration Court Trends

July 6, 2021

Immigration News: USCIS Waives Interviews, Biden Holds Naturalization Event, Immigration Court Trends

Author: New York Immigration Lawyer Alena Shautsova

With the new administration in the Oval Office, the Immigration system and USCIS started to change rapidly. To date, USCIS changed its policies including honoring prior decisions, granting U visa applicants work permits, extending work permits for adjustment of status applicants, and more. In one recent trend, USCIS also started to waive interviews for certain adjustments of status applicants. USCIS waives interviews for employment-based, SIJ based adjustments, as well as VAWA based adjustments, and I 730 beneficiaries.

USCIS focus on Naturalization:

In addition, USCIS announced that it would continue to focus on promoting naturalization and citizenship. In fact, President Biden hosted a naturalization event during which 21immigrants became new US citizens: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUertGpv7rw

Reopening of Immigration courts:

Immigration courts are set to open next week, and you need to be prepared. Learn more on our Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCBSrIQswMdYh_T1qToEZRrQ!

Immigration Reform Updates: When Will It Happen?

June 27, 2021

Immigration Reform Updates: When Will It Happen?

Author: New York Immigration Lawyer Alena Shautsova

A picture containing text, sky, person  Description automatically generated

In the law office of Alena Shautsova, New York Immigration attorney, we help non-citizens to achieve their dreams to become US lawful permanent residents and citizens. Biden administration voiced their commitment to change the US Immigration System and do all in their power to deliver the Immigration reform. But the executive branch of the government is limited in its actions. Although changing USCIS policies will help thousands of people, the real relief can be brought by the legislative arm of the government or Congress only. Here, we will discuss some of the legislative proposals that were recently introduced or reintroduced by the President, Republicans and Democrats. I will share my thoughts regarding the possible success of the proposals and the latest news related to their status.

The US citizenship Act of 2021. This is the law that was proposed by President Biden. This proposal is very broad and if passed, would bring relief to pretty much every non-citizen who has been residing in the US since January 1, 2021. It has two main tracks: one is for those who do not have any status in the US and are not DACA, or TPS holders and are not agricultural workers. It proposes first a temporary residence for six years with an opportunity to file for permanent residence after five years. Once the person holds permanent residence for three years, he/she will be able to apply for naturalization. For DACA, TPS holders, and Agricultural workers it creates a direct path to green card. There are other significant proposals contained in this act, such as the elimination of the one-year asylum filing deadline, for example.  The only update we have with regard to its current status is that on April 28, 2021, it was referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration and Citizenship. In my opinion, it is unlikely that this proposal will pass in its current form, just because it is too broad, does not contain any limitations on the length of the residency required to meet the qualifications for temporary status, and I would treat it more as a conversation starter rather than the practical proposal that can be worked on.

The Dream and Promise Act of 2021, is a bipartisan bill, that would provide conditional permanent resident status for 10 years to  “dreamers”: a qualifying alien who entered the United States as a minor (18 years old or younger on the date of the entry) and (1) is deportable or inadmissible, (2) has deferred enforced departure (DED) status or temporary protected status (TPS) (resided in the US since January 1, 2017 in a TPS status), or (3) is the child of certain classes of nonimmigrants. The bill imposes various qualifying requirements, such as the alien being continuously physically present in the United States since January 1, 2021, passing a background check, and being enrolled in or having completed certain educational programs. DHS shall remove the conditions placed on permanent resident status granted under this bill if the alien applies and meets certain requirements, such as completing certain programs at an educational institution, serving in the military, or being employed. Furthermore, DHS and DOJ shall cancel the removal of certain aliens who had TPS, were eligible for TPS, or were eligible for DED status on certain dates. Such an alien shall receive permanent resident status upon meeting certain requirements and applying for such status within three years of this bill’s enactment.”

This Bill is much narrower in nature, is tailored for DACA holders, and TPS holders, rather than all non-citizens. For that reason, taking the conservative opposition, it has a real potential of being passed, perhaps with some modifications. The last action on the bill was performed on June 15, 2021 when hearings in the Senate took place.

Citizenship for Essential Workers Act 2021 is another great proposal that, if passed, will bring relief to millions, because it happened that millions of undocumented immigrants in the US are also essential workers, working in construction, health care and child care services, food preparation, delivery, trucking, restaurants, and retail businesses, etc. that served and saved the country during the COVID pandemic. The bill would grant adjustment of status or green card to anyone who can prove that they earned income during the pandemic, even if a person had a prior order of removal, as long as the person passes security background checks. An employer will have to confirm that the employee worked for them, facing severe sanctions in case of arbitrary refusal. The Bill would allow depends of the main applicants (sons, daughters, spouses, parents in certain situations, to benefit form it as well). The following sectors are covered by the bill:

“(A) Health care.

“(B) Emergency response.

“(C) Sanitation.

“(D) Restaurant ownership, food preparation, vending, catering, food packaging, food services, or delivery.

“(E) Hotel or retail.

“(F) Fish, poultry, and meat processing work.

“(G) Agricultural work, including labor that is seasonal in nature.

“(H) Commercial or residential landscaping.

“(I) Commercial or residential construction or renovation.

“(J) Housing, residential, and commercial construction related activities or public works construction.

“(K) Domestic work in private households, including child care, home care, or house cleaning.

“(L) Natural disaster recovery, disaster reconstruction, and related construction.

“(M) Home and community-based work, including—

“(i) home health care;

“(ii) residential care;

“(iii) assistance with activities of daily living;

“(iv) any service provided by direct care workers (as defined in section 799B of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295p)), personal care aides, job coaches, or supported employment providers; and

“(v) any other provision of care to individuals in their homes by direct service providers, personal care attendants, and home health aides.

“(N) Family care, including child care services, in-home child care services such as nanny services, and care services provided by family members to other family members.

“(O) Manufacturing.

“(P) Warehousing.

“(Q) Transportation or logistics.

“(R) Janitorial.

“(S) Laundromat and dry-cleaning operators.

As one can see, it is very broad. Most importantly, it would also help a parent, spouse, son, or daughter of a member of the Armed Forces, including the National Guard. The only continuing presence requirement to meet under this bill: is that a person has to reside in the US since January 1, 2021 and until the application is approved. Ineligible individuals will include those who: “(A) departed the United States while subject to an order of exclusion, deportation, removal, or voluntary departure; and

“(B) (i) was outside the United States on January 1, 2021; or

“(ii) reentered the United States unlawfully after January 1, 2021.

The last action on this bill was undertaken on May 12, 2021 when Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, and Border Safety held hearings.

Farm Workforce Modernization Act of 2021. This is another bill that has a lot of potential due to its limited nature. Under the bill, DHW would grant a status an applying alien who “ (1) performed at least 1,035 hours of agricultural labor during the two-year period prior to March 8, 2021; (2) on that date was inadmissible, deportable, or under a grant of deferred enforced departure or temporary protected status; and (3) has been continuously present in the United States from that date until receiving CAW (certified agricultural worker)  status. The bill imposes additional crime-related inadmissibility grounds on CAW applicants and makes some other grounds inapplicable.” The status shall be valid for 5.5 years and may be extended. DHS may grant dependent status to the spouse or children of a principal alien. An alien with a pending application may not be detained or removed by DHS and shall be authorized for employment until DHS makes a final decision on the application. A CAW alien (and dependents) may apply for lawful permanent resident status after meeting various requirements, including performing a certain amount of agricultural labor for a number of years. The last action on the bill was March 22, 2021 when it was received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

In March of 2021, House Republicans also offered something called Dignity Plan, but the only information available so far is the draft of the main points. The text of the prosal draft is available here: https://files.constantcontact.com/1849eea4801/326f035f-8025-4a33-a40a-cbb3a5c06c46.pdf

Among the main points is that this proposal created a long-term path to a green card, includes a fine as a part of the application process, and provides a temporary status first for 10 years, with an opportunity to qualify for a  green card later.

There are the main proposals with real potentials to be adopted, at least in parts. As one can see, so far the latest action on any of them was performed in mid-June.  Taking into consideration Democrats’ voiced attempts to try to pass some Immigration provisions as a part of the budget voting, it can be expected that any future meaningful actions shall be undertaken no earlier than Fall of 2021.

In the meantime, one can try to benefit from the ICE/DHS prosecutorial discretion and changed USCIS policies that may bring at least temporary relief.

f you need help with Immigration challenges in the US, book a confidential consultation by calling 917 885 2261. (Consultation fees apply).

Follow me on: